Friday, September 5, 2008

On the Responsibilities of Lenders

HUDSON. Bad loan managers were facilitated by repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act. Bad management has been built into the conflict of interest that goes hand in hand with vertical integration of the banks, brokerage houses, Wall Street and mortgage lenders. You find this particularly in Citibank and Countrywide Financial. The October 2007 Columbia Journalism Review includes an article, “A Tale of Two Citis,” that describes how Sandy Weill built his empire on subprime lending. Much of the research was done by Michael Hudson of the Wall Street Journal (not me, a different Michael Hudson). In his article “Banking on Misery: Citigroup, Wall Street, and the Fleecing of the South,” he describes how the banks found it in their interest to
have affiliates that wrote mortgages way beyond the ability of borrowers to pay, because they knew they could turn around and sell these mortgages to someone else and avoid liability. Nobody knows who is liable for the defaults. Is it the current mortgage holder? Is it the mortgage originator? Is it the mortgage brokers who are now going out of business and therefore can’t be held liable? All of this is going to take a long time in the courts.
ACRES U.S.A. Is there a remedy for this situation?
HUDSON. I’ll describe one solution I think is a good one. This approach was prevalent in New York State, where I live, before the American Revolution, and it’s a law that is still on the books here — the law of fraudulent conveyance. Around the time of the Revolution, a lot of New York farmers borrowed from British lenders who would come over, make a loan to a farmer far in excess of the normal ability to pay, and then, just before the crop was harvested, just before the farmer had liquidity, they would call in the loan, that is, demand that it be paid. The farmer
couldn’t pay because he hadn’t sold his crop yet or because the loan was too big to begin with, and the British creditor would foreclose. To stop this practice, New York State passed the law of fraudulent conveyance, which said that if a creditor makes a loan to a borrower without having any idea how the borrower can repay the loan, then that loan is nullified. That law is still on the books, as I mentioned, and it was often brought up in court in the 1980s, when corporate raiders would load down companies with corporate debt. If this law were implemented nationwide, it would apply to subprime borrowers and other borrowers who signed loan agreements far in excess of what they could pay, once the teaser interest rates adjusted to much higher levels.


Debtor Nation
The Hijacking of America’s Economy

http://www.michael-hudson.com/

No comments: